🧪 Hazmat Equipment
Identification

Chemical Identification Tools: Raman, FTIR, and Tubes

How field identification tools support hazmat teams without replacing sampling discipline, reference libraries, or lab confirmation.

Selection guide, not an endorsement. Equipment choices must follow department risk assessment, applicable standards, manufacturer instructions, fit testing, maintenance records, calibration policy, and technician training.
Written by
Koray Korkut
Reviewed by
Ertuğrul Öz
Last reviewed
Aug 30, 2026
Source checked
Aug 30, 2026
Koray Korkut
Koray Korkut
Fire Department Director, Karabük | Hazmat, CBRN, Incident Command
Ertuğrul Öz
Ertuğrul Öz
Firefighter Sergeant, Ankara Metropolitan Fire | Training & Operations

Field Use

Chemical identification tools can narrow a mystery, confirm shipping papers, support product control, and guide protective actions. They do not make a hazardous sample harmless, and they do not remove the need for PPE, decon, chain of custody, or lab confirmation when required.

Raman, FTIR, colorimetric tubes, pH paper, test strips, and reference databases each have strengths and blind spots. Good programs buy the tool, the library, the training, the sampling procedure, and the quality-control process together.

In practice, most hazmat teams don't choose one tool over another — they run a layered approach, using a quick colorimetric tube or pH strip to narrow the hazard class before ever bringing out a Raman or FTIR device for confirmation.

The library behind the instrument matters as much as the hardware: a device with an outdated or narrow chemical library will confidently return a wrong or 'no match' result on a compound it was never trained to recognize.

Tool Comparison

RamanCan identify many solids/liquids through some containers; fluorescence, mixtures, dark containers, and safety limits can interfere.
FTIRStrong for many liquids, solids, and unknowns with direct sample contact or accessory methods; library quality matters.
Colorimetric tubesTargeted gas/vapor screening with known tube chemistry; cross-sensitivity and pump technique affect results.
pH / stripsFast acid/base or oxidizer clue, not a full product identification.

On the Scene: A Layered ID Approach

  • An unlabeled drum leaking a corrosive-smelling liquid is first screened with pH paper to confirm acid versus base, narrowing the hazard class before any instrument comes out of the case.
  • A suspicious white powder incident uses a Raman device through the original packaging where possible, avoiding unnecessary sample handling, before any decision to open the container for FTIR analysis.
  • A tanker placarded for an organic peroxide but with damaged paperwork has technicians cross-check colorimetric tube results against the shipping manifest and ERG guide before committing to a specific product-control plan.

Purchase Questions

  • What sample states, containers, mixtures, and concentrations can the tool handle?
  • How often are libraries updated, and can results be exported for documentation?
  • What PPE, sampling, decon, and evidence procedures are required?
  • How does the tool perform in sunlight, smoke, weather, cold, and with gloved hands?
  • What training hours and recurring competency checks will the department fund?

Do Not

  • Do not open unknown containers just to get a better reading unless a trained plan supports it.
  • Do not treat a library match as lab confirmation when legal, medical, or cleanup decisions require stronger proof.
  • Do not forget that mixtures, contamination, packaging, and fluorescence can mislead instruments.
  • Do not separate the device purchase from sampling tools, PPE, decon, and documentation.

Official Sources

Official sources are linked for verification. This page is a firefighter training reference, not legal, medical, or product endorsement advice.

FAQ — Chemical ID

Neither is universally better. Raman can read through some containers; FTIR is strong for many direct-contact samples. The right choice depends on mission profile, sample types, libraries, training, and budget.

Yes. Tubes can be simple, targeted, and useful when the suspected chemical is known, but they require correct tube selection, pump technique, and cross-sensitivity awareness.

Often yes for many common containers and packaging types, which is a major safety advantage, though dark containers, fluorescent samples, and certain plastics can interfere with the reading.

Many well-funded regional teams carry both because their strengths and blind spots differ, but smaller departments often choose one based on their most common sample types and budget.

Most manufacturers release regular library updates, and teams should apply them on a set schedule since new or emerging compounds — like novel synthetic opioids — are added over time.
🔥 Live Tracker

Watch Active Wildfires — Live

Real-time map, acreage, and containment for every major U.S. wildfire, updated from official NIFC data.

View Live Map →